Matteo Martineau vs Patrick Zahraj Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve: Patrick Zahraj wins 42.48% of second serve points, slightly less than Matteo Martineau's 43.78%. Could this give Martineau an edge?
• Return Game: With Zahraj winning 46.74% of opponents' second serve points compared to Martineau's 44.04%, Zahraj appears stronger in return games.
• First Serve Returns: Margins are narrow, with Zahraj at 25.55% and Martineau slightly ahead at 26.01%, impacting predictions in close matches.
• Pressure Situations: Zahraj has a slight advantage in breakpoint situations with a 58.92% save rate against Martineau's 58.77%.
• Match Wins: Zahraj has a significantly better win rate over the past year at 55.56% compared to Martineau's 41.38%.
• Surface Performance: Zahraj excels on Indoor hard courts (65% win rate), while Martineau is strongest on Hard courts (65% win rate).
• Tournament Level: Zahraj performs better in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 57.63% of matches versus Martineau's 42.86%.
• Head-to-Head: Martineau leads with a single win in their only encounter, where he won convincingly in straight sets.
• Opponent Ranking: Zahraj has faced less challenging opponents (average rank 351.78) compared to Martineau (average rank 275.07).
• Deciding Sets: Zahraj shows greater resilience, winning 56% of deciding sets compared to Martineau's 44%.

Editorial Prediction (September 30, 2025, UTC):

In analyzing the upcoming match between Patrick Zahraj and Matteo Martineau, several key statistics can guide us to a prediction. Zahraj leads in overall match performance and breakpoint resilience. His ability to perform on indoor hard surfaces and his stronger tournament showing also make him a formidable opponent.

However, in their direct head-to-head, Martineau has the advantage, having defeated Zahraj previously in straight sets. This history could offer Martineau a psychological edge.

While Martineau's serving strength is slightly better, Zahraj's superior performance in return games and decisive set situations could prove crucial.

Considering these factors, while the match may be closely contested, Patrick Zahraj is likely to emerge as the winner due to his overall stronger form and resilience in critical match situations.